Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Sharpen Your Bible Study Skills
Part 5 of a 5 Part Series
It's
been said that knowledge for the sake of knowledge is of little value.
However, one gains wisdom when knowledge is applied. The same thing holds
true about sound Biblical interpretation principles.
They’re nice to know but are of no real benefit unless they can be
rightfully applied. Today we’re
going to test our application skills as we exegete (explain by critical
analysis) one of the most perplexing Scriptures to our fellowship.
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law
or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them” (Matt.
5:17
). Many Christians
believe including a number of Biblical scholars that what Jesus said here
proves that the OT laws are NOT done away with but are still binding on NT
Christians. In explaining this, they
artificially divide the Law into 3 categories.
They state that after the death and resurrection of Jesus, Christians are
no longer bound by the ceremonial and civil laws.
But the one exception is the moral law i.e. the Ten Commandments.
They believe these are still valid and binding on Christians.
Questions we need to ask before we begin to exegete this
Scripture.
1)
Is this scripture at odds with or nullify dozens of plain
scriptures in the NT (Romans
3:20
-26 for example) that state the OC law, including the 10 Commandments,
has been replaced by the NC of grace? Why/why
not?
“No one will be declared righteous in his sight
by observing the law; rather, through the law we became conscious of sin.
But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made know to
which the Law and the Prophets testify. This
righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe.
There is no difference, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory
of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came
by Jesus Christ. God presented him
as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood.”
2)
Would knowing how Matthew used the Greek word for “fulfill” in
other verses in his Gospel help us determine how he used the same word in Matt.
5:17?
3)
Would reading this verse in context of Jesus’ whole “Sermon on
the Mount” – recorded in Matthew 5-7 help us to better understand
what Jesus meant here in Matt. 5:17?
In this study we’re going to analyze this verse and the
next three verses by answering the following questions: 1) What did Matthew mean
when he used the word “fulfill” in this verse?
2) How did Jesus “fulfill” the Law and the Prophets?
3) What is the relationship of these verses to the rest of Jesus’
teaching on the Sermon on the Mount?
1) What did Matthew mean when he used the word
“fulfill” in this verse? Before
we answer that question we first need to correct a common misconception.
Many people focus on the word “Law” in this verse and assume that the
question is whether Jesus came to do away with or retain the OT law i.e. the 10
commandments. But Jesus is not
talking about any of the commandments given in the five books of OT. He’s
talking about Scripture as a whole. Jesus
is talking about the Law (singular) – meaning the Torah, the first five books
of OT and the Prophets – another major section of the OT.
Now, Matthew used the Greek word pleroo, which we
translate into the English as “fulfill.” Pleroo” means, “to fill,
complete, bring to completion, fulfill.” [Pleroo never means, “to
do” or “keep on doing” or “to fulfill in such a way as to perfect a
foundation on which to build further” as some have insisted.]
“In the New Testament pleroo is used quite frequently for the
fulfillment of prophetic sayings. Pleroo
is also used in the New Testament in the sense of filling with something, always
with a strong element of exclusiveness or totality” (The New Testament
Greek-English Dictionary; Vol. Pi-Rho; page 214-215).
We
need to note that every time Matthew uses the word “fulfill” in his Gospel,
it’s always in conjunction with the prophetic events connected to the life of
Christ: the virgin birth --Matthew 1:22-23, “All this took place to fulfill
(pleroo) what the Lord had said through the prophets: ‘The virgin will be with
child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel – which
means: ‘God with us.’”; Jesus called out of Egypt –- 2:15; the
weeping for the babies Herod killed – 2:17; Jesus residing in
Nazareth -- 2:23; Jesus would bear our infirmities -- 8:17, Jesus’
ministry -- 12:17-21; the rejection of Jesus by the people --
13:14-15; Jesus riding into Jerusalem on a donkey -- 21:4-5; Jesus
preparing to die on the cross without angelic help -- 26:53-54; the
disciples fleeing Jesus at Gethsemane – 26:56; the Chief Priests took
the 30 pieces of silver, initially given to Judas, to ultimately buy potter’s
field -- 27:9-10. “Then what
was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled (pleroo): ‘They took the
thirty silver coins, the price set on him by the people of
Israel
, and they used them to buy the potter’s
field, as the Lord commanded me.’”
In
every one of these 11 instances, the action was a one-time event, which
“fulfilled” or brought to completion OT prophecy concerning an aspect of the
life of Jesus. In every instance,
there was no further fulfillment to be done by anyone else.
It was not a foundation to build upon.
For these reasons we must interpret the word “fulfill” in Matt.
5:17
as referring to something
that Jesus would fulfill or complete in connection with his work as the Messiah.
Perhaps
Luke gives us the best insight as to what Jesus meant in Matt. 5:17.
After his resurrection Jesus made this statement to his disciples.
“‘This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything
must be fulfilled (pleroo) that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the
Prophets and the Psalms.’ Then he
opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
He told them, ‘This is what is written: ‘The Christ will suffer and
rise from the dead on the third day, and repentance and forgiveness of sins will
be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at
Jerusalem
’” (Luke 24:44-47).
Questions
and/or comments.
2)
How did Jesus “fulfill” the Law and the Prophets? Jesus
is saying here that the Law and the Prophets were to continue until he (the
Messiah) accomplished everything that he was sent to do by his Father, which
included his ministry, death, and resurrection.
Almost all NT scholars would agree that Jesus fulfilled the prophecies
written by the Prophets concerning his first coming.
But some scholars continue to ask, “How did he fulfill the Law?”
The
following is a partial list of aspects of the law, which pointed to the Messiah,
that were fulfilled by Jesus. 1.
Sacrifices – his one atoning sacrifice (1 John 2:1-2); 2. Tabernacle
– the incarnation (Jn.
1:14
);
3. Showbread – the bread of life (Jn.
6:48
); 4. Candlestick – light of
the world (Jn.
8:12
); 5. High Priest – the
ultimate High Priest (Heb.
7:27
-30); 6. Veil of the
Temple
– Christ’s body (Heb.
10:19
-20);
7. Circumcision of the flesh – circumcision of the heart (Rom.
2:28
-29);
8. Passover – Lamb of God (Jn.
1:36
, 1 Cor. 5:7); 9. Day of
Atonement – his perfect sacrifice to unite us with God (Col. 1:21-22);
10. Jubilee – spiritual liberation (Luke
4:18
-19).
So
given this understanding, we come to the inevitable conclusion that Jesus
didn’t come to destroy the Law but to fulfill its intentions completely and
perfectly. Continuing with this same
thought, Jesus then said, "I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth
disappear, not the smallest letter (jot), nor the least stroke of the pen (tittle),
will be any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished (
5:18
).
The
Greek verb translated “accomplished” is ginomai, which has two basic
meanings – 1) to become, to come into being, to be produced, to happen; 2) it
an also function as the verb “to be” in conjunction with other words.
Obviously context determines which meaning should be used.
It’s
interesting to note that ginomai is Matthew’s choice of verb when he
quoted Jesus’ prophetic statement in Matt. 24:34-35.
“I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away
until all these things have happened [are accomplished; are fulfilled] (ginomai).
Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away” (NIV).
“Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away
till all these things are fulfilled (ginomai).
Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will by no means pass
away” (NKJ).
In conclusion, if certain Christians or denominations are
going to use this text in Matthew to “prove” the perpetuity of the OC
demands (the 10 commandments) over a NT Christian, then the words “the Law
or the Prophets” indicate that a Christian is obligated to keep all of
the Law (613 commands) not just a part of the law.
The Bible shows that the Torah is a unit of 613 laws, which stand or fall
together. See Gal. 5:2-4; James
2:10.
“Mark my words! I,
Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no
value to you at all. Again I declare
to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the
whole law. You who are trying to be
justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from
grace” (Gal. 5:2-4 NIV).
“For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at
just one point is guilty of breaking all of it” (James
2:10
NIV).
Questions
and/or comments.
3) What is the relationship of these verses to the rest
of Jesus’ teaching on the Sermon on the Mount?
Now
let’s look at the next two verses. "Anyone
who breaks the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same
will be called the least in the Kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and
teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of Pharisees
and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of
heaven" (5:19-20).
Scholars
debate whether the word “these” in “these commands” refer
back to the previous verses (i.e. the OC Law or Prophets) or point forward to
the 5 teachings or commands Jesus gave in verses 21-47.
While most scholars feel it refers back to verses 17-18, others
think that Jesus began to introduce his next set of teaching points – “you
have heard…but I tell you.”
The
answer to this perplexing question may lie in Jesus’ key statement in verse
20, “unless your righteousness surpasses that of Pharisees and the
teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.”
This statement appears to match his concluding comment concerning these 5
NC teachings he had just given -- “Be
perfect (spiritually mature), therefore, as your heavenly Father is
perfect” (5:48).
Without
understanding the historical background, we can’t grasp the importance and
impact of Jesus’ teaching as recorded in Matt. 5:21-48.
To the Jews, the Law was absolutely holy and absolutely revered.
According to William Barclay, “’Only Moses’ decrees,’ said Philo,
‘are everlasting, unchangeable and unshakable.’
They (the Rabbis) said, ‘Even if one says that the Law is from God with
the exception of this or that verse then there applies to him the judgment.
He has despised the word of the Lord; he has shown the irreverence which
merits the destruction of his soul.’’ (The Gospel of Matthew; page
134).
No
fewer than five times, Jesus quotes the Law of Moses and then claimed the right
to point out the inadequacies of the most sacred writings in the world and to
correct them out of his own wisdom by declaring a teaching of his own.
Jesus dared to change what was called by the Jews the “unchangeable
word of God.” Matthew 5
shows that not only did Jesus come to fulfill the Law, but he also came to
supercede the Law of Moses with his own law -- the Law of Christ.
We
know that Jesus came to reveal the higher intent behind the law that was given
to Moses. This higher intent often
called by scholars, as the spiritual intent, would later be written in the
hearts of his followers when they received the Holy Spirit.
This higher or spiritual intent is what Jesus revealed in Matt.
5:21-48 when he said, "You have heard…but I tell you.
In discussing five different laws of the OC, Jesus told them that God
judged true righteousness, not by what people did but rather what attitude and
thoughts they had in their hearts.
Jesus
taught that hate was equal to murder and lust was equal to adultery.
Jesus taught that a higher law of truthfulness prohibits swearing; that a
higher law of goodwill voids the right to vengeance; that a higher law of love
tells us to love our enemies not just our friends.
These concepts cannot be found in the OC.
They are new revelations from the Son of God.
That’s
how a person’s righteousness – an inward righteousness – could exceed the
righteousness of the Pharisees, who only had an outward showing.
In Matt. 23:13-36 Jesus condemned the Pharisees for their lack of
true righteousness as defined by God. These
are two key verses. “You give a
tenth of your spices -- mint, dill
and cumin. But you have neglected
the more important matters of the law – justice, mercy, and faithfulness”
(Matt.23:23). “On the
outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of
hypocrisy and wickedness” (Matt. 23:28).
Continuing
with his teachings in Matthew 6, Jesus challenged the traditional wisdom
of the day, based on the OC teachings, concerning almsgiving to the poor,
prayer, fasting, storing treasure in heaven, and trusting in God.
Again he emphasized that good and noble actions without a proper attitude
of reverence and humility accounted for very little in the eyes of God.
Finally
in Matthew 7, Jesus gave a statement that’s called the “capstone”
to his “Sermon on the Mount.” This
capstone reveals the “higher law of love” behind the Law of Moses.
This capstone demonstrates how Jesus came to transform the Law of Moses
with the Law of Christ. "So
in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up
the Law and the Prophets" (Matt. 7:12 NIV).
William Barclay noted, “This is something which had never been said
before. It is a new view of life’s
obligations” (Ibid; p273).
When
looking at the “Sermon on the Mount” in its entire context of three chapters
with its 110 verses, it’s impossible to conclude that Jesus was teaching that
the OC laws were to be retained. An
honest analysis of these verses reveals that Jesus was stating that the OC laws
were inadequate. He showed this by
revealing the perfect standard of righteousness God had intended all along.
Jesus transformed or changed every major category of the OC law by his
new teachings.
[Footnote:
Now the spiritual intent behind all of God’s commands can be summed up with
the word love -- love and reverence
towards God; love and respect towards our fellow man.
Jesus revealed this spiritual intent when a Pharisee he was challenged by
a Pharisees in Matt. 22.
"One of them (a Pharisee), an expert in the
law, tested him with this question: 'Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?'
Jesus replied: 'Love the
Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your
mind.' (Deut. 6:5) This is the first and greatest commandment.
And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'
(Lev. 19:18) All the Law and
the Prophets hang on these two commandments'" (Mat. 22:35-40).
Jesus, the Son of God, takes this opportunity to reveal the
higher law of God — the law behind the Law of Moses. In saying, "All
the Law and the Prophets (i.e. all the OT Scriptures) hang on these two
commandments", Jesus revealed that all the commandments expounded in
the Law and all the teachings of the Prophets cannot be fulfilled apart from
this two-fold law of love. The Greek
word translated ‘hang on” literally means “are suspended from.”
The apostle Paul understood this relationship between the
Law of the OC and love as revealed by Jesus.
“Let no doubt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love
one another, for he who loves his fellow man has fulfilled (pleroo) the law.
The commandments, ‘Do not commit adultery,’ ‘Do not murder,’
‘Do not steal,’ ‘Do not covet,’ and whatever other commandments there
may be, are summed up in this one rule: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’
Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore
love is the fulfillment (noun version of plerro) of the law” (Romans 13:8-10
NIV).]
November 6, 2005
Larry Omasta
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
|